Friday, December 4, 2009
"Progressive"- It's just another weasel word.
"Progressive" is merely a term that was salvaged from the scrapheap of history, sorry but that's too great a metaphor not to steal, by the alleged "left" in this country because the Limbaughs,Kristols,et al had so demonized the word "liberal." That's basically it, plain and simple. The problem is, that in spite of the fact they were led by one of the biggest imperialists and warmongers, the original Progressives,were a bunch of Bolsheviks, compared to the hegemonic capitalists who wrap themselves in the "progressive" mantle today.
While some of us here know that modern-day liberalism was founded to be a capitalist-friendly "third way" between socialism,and conservatism, most people do not. If they did and truly understood this history they would not waste all of their time and effort into trying to make "liberals", and The Democratic Party in particular, into the socialists they might want them to be.
A "progressive" is someone who cannot admit to the systemic failure of the society. Through this stubborn blindness, they reveal their own fundamental loyalty to the social system as a whole. The solution to the "anti-democratic" turn in American politics is not to question its foundations but to proscribe "more democracy" or "real democracy", without evaluating for a minute whether the ""turn" is really an aberration. In economics, a "progressive" is one who blames an excess of greed, a deficiency of regulation, or the corruption of the state rather than the normal operation of capitalism. In this way, "progressives" are identical to Libertarians who, in the face of insurmountable evidence, continue to insist that it is "too little" and not too much "free enterprise" which is the problem.
We need a capitalism based on good intentions says the one, based on a strengthening of the "individual" claims the next, and one purged of racial corruption declares the last. Fixing capitalism is the highest and in fact the only slogan of all of the above, and this in the most trivial and unhistorical way possible. Those are the last and the only words of this brand of "radical" criticism which is actually a radical support for the society as it exists... if only that society could be "allowed" to achieve its "true" nature.
All too often "progressive" has come to mean someone who will offer unconditional support to The Democratic Party no matter what.
A progressive is someone who believes in the system.
Progressives and liberals are as ready as conservatives to support government interventions in our lives and on the world stage. The country in question may be Sudan, Afghanistan or perhaps Iran. The clarion call is the same. "We must do something” because “we” are superior, all knowing, and chosen by a divine force to make the world in whatever image we choose.
No one asks how “we” is defined, or if the presence of the United States is needed or wanted. No one asks about the history of past interventions and their usually negative outcomes. It is assumed that Americans are good and know what is best for the world, despite a long history of numerous brutalities carried out across the globe.
Thursday, February 19, 2009
You know I'm wondering about this.
In only a month we've seen that Obama is going to continue with the Imperial juggernaut unfettered by any pesky constituents who dreamt otherwise.
In only a month we've seen Obama will gladly hand over taxpayer dollar to the proven grand bandits of Wall St. and will do so in amounts that would leave even the Bush gang green with envy.
In only a month we've seen that the much rumored Changling has surrounded himself with a cesspool of reactionary troglodytes, the very same pariahs that have been swirling around DC for decades.
So I wonder, as we bear witness to the entire charade what are the responsibilities of those who approached their guy with nothing less than religious fervor.
Do these people not have any responsibility to hold their man's "feet to the fire?"
Do they not bear any responsibility for the criminal acts they have enabled with their tacit or vocal support for this guy?
So do they just get to walk away from the voting booth and now just lament that their guy has been "a disappointment so far" and not bear any responsibility for his policies, policies which many of us have described in detail long before they even became policies?
Is their any responsibility for every child who is bombed by US planes in Afghanistan?
Is their any responsibility for the Obama supported continuation of the corporate takeover of the world and for this unending financial disaster?
What about for wiretapping and rendition (both of which Obama supports)?
Are you willing to stand behind Obama as he commits crime after crime?
I need to know.
Tuesday, January 20, 2009
Such breathtaking analysis on Lincoln's bible, was it his, which version of the bible is it yada, yada, yada.
Anyone who naysays The Prince of Hope is a "beyond the pale cynic" who only wants to harsh the buzz of the American moment.
What color is Michele's dress? Mustard?
So beautiful "comity" between the aisles.
Joe Biden chatting away. Does that even need to be discussed? Twitter, twitter, twitter.
Everyone's here but the star of the show, Barack H. Obama.
Baritone voice: "Ladies and Gentlemen."
Heraldic trumpets in the background.
"My country tis of thee,
Sweet land of liberty...and so on..."
"Great stuff" coming soon to the American political theatre.
Warmed over American Exceptionalism.
Whitewashing of history.
Veiled threats to those who don't get on board.
America as 'can-do' Nation and pretty darn special in fact the mostest specialist ever, in God's eyes.
The Market, The Market, The Market.
I'm pretty sure you could write a simple computer program to create an Obama speech.
"The challenges before us are great. The obstacles we face are daunting. We must stand determined. The road ahead is long and hard.
But together we will rise to a New Day. Through the strength of our principles and courage of our convictions..blah blah blah"
Industrial strength pablum is what it is..gotta be a vat of it in some factory in New Jersey or something..takes a lot more than Maalox to choke this crap down.